ALSERepository of Iași University of Life Sciences, ROMANIA

Protein content stability of triticale genotypes under multiple environments using AMMI analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kendal, Enver
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-25T06:28:31Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-25T06:28:31Z
dc.date.issued 2024-07-09
dc.identifier.citation Kendal, Enver. 2024. “Protein content stability of triticale genotypes under multiple environments using AMMI analysis”. Journal of Applied Life Sciences and Environment 57 (3): 359-370. https://doi.org/10.46909/alse-573141 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2784 - 0379
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iuls.ro/xmlui/handle/20.500.12811/4515
dc.description.abstract Triticale is an important source of protein in animal nutrition, both as grain and silage. Protein is a quality criterion that is strongly affected by the environment and genetic factors. The objectives of this study were to assess genotype–environment (G-E) interactions and determine and compare stable genotypes to recommend for further evaluation. The protein content of 12 genotypes obtained from 7 environments were evaluated using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis in the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 growing seasons in 4 locations in Turkey. The variance of AMMI analysis based on protein content showed a significant effect of environment, genotype and G–E interaction, with a 93.0, 2.3 and 4.5% total variation, respectively. Partitioning of the total sum of squares showed that the effect of environment was a predominant source of variation, followed by the G–E interaction and genotype effect. AMMI analysis showed that the first principal component was highly significant at P < 0.01. The mean grain protein content varied from 14.9 to 16.2% among the genotypes and from 10.9 to 18.8% among the environments. AMMI analysis indicated that G3, G12 and G1 were quite promising genotypes. G8, which was used as a variety candidate in this research, was quite stable but had a low protein value. In addition, G3, G11 and G12 had a higher protein content than the standard varieties evaluated in this research. G3 had both a high protein content and stable genotype; therefore, it can be recommended to release as a candidate. As AMMI analysis indicated, E1 and E7 environments were especially suitable for protein studies in triticale, while E4, E5 and E6 showed poor results and were not suitable environments. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iași University of Life Sciences en_US
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject AMMI en_US
dc.subject location en_US
dc.subject protein content en_US
dc.subject triticale en_US
dc.subject genotypes en_US
dc.subject stability en_US
dc.subject animal nutrition en_US
dc.title Protein content stability of triticale genotypes under multiple environments using AMMI analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.author.affiliation Enver Kendal, Department of Field Crops, Kızıltepe Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Mardin Artuklu University, 47000, Mardin, Türkiye
dc.author.affiliation Enver Kendal, Department of Plant and Animal Production, Kiziltepe Vocational and Training High School, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Türkiye
dc.publicationName Journal of Applied Life Sciences and Environment
dc.volume 57
dc.issue 3
dc.publicationDate 2024
dc.startingPage 359
dc.endingPage 370
dc.identifier.eissn 2784 - 0360
dc.identifier.doi 10.46909/alse-573141


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)